Difference between revisions of "WikiCMS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| Maps || [[File:kensingtonpalacemap.png|120px]] | | Maps || [[File:kensingtonpalacemap.png|120px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Lists || | + | | Lists || [[File:List.png|120px]] |
|- | |- | ||
| Tables || | | Tables || | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 6 October 2017
<slideshow style="bitplan" headingmark="⌘⌘" incmark="…" scaled="true" font="Comic Sans MS, Calibri, cursive" >
- title
WikiCMS
- author
- Wolfgang Fahl info@bitplan.com
- footer
- Using SemanticMediaWiki as a Content Management System
- subfooter
- SMW CON Fall 2017
</slideshow>
WikiCMS
⌘⌘ Intro
Content is 
⌘⌘ Wolfgang Fahl
- Wolfgang wf@bitplan.com is from germany.
- He is a teacher for software architecture
- He has been working with MediaWiki since 2007
- He has started learning english in England
⌘⌘ Agenda
- What is a Content Management System CMS?
- Could you use a MediaWiki/Semantic MediaWiki as a CMS?
- Why would you not use MediaWiki as your CMS?
- Why would you use MediaWiki as a CMS?
- WikiCMS: use Semantic MediaWiki as CMS
⌘⌘ What is a Content Management System CMS?
According to Wikipedia a Content Management System has the following features:
- a CMS supports the creation and modification of digital content.
- a CMS is a collaborative environment
- a CMS supports
- format management
- history editing
- version control
- indexing
- search
- retrieval
- a CMS supports the separation of content and presentation
⌘⌘ Could you use a MediaWiki Semantic MediaWiki as a CMS?
- MediaWiki supports the creation and modification of digital content. ✓
- MediaWiki is a collaborative environment ✓
- MediaWiki supports
- format management ✓
- history editing ✓
- version control ✓
- indexing ✓
- search ✓
- retrieval ✓
- MediaWiki supports the separation of content and presentation ✓
⌘⌘ Why would you not use MediaWiki as your CMS?
- Anyone can edit it
- No workflow
- No approval method built into the wiki
⌘⌘ Why would you use MediaWiki as a CMS?
- MediaWiki is free
- MediaWiki is proven to work
- There is a lot of knowledge/documentation about MediaWiki available
- There are lots of extensions available of MediaWiki
⌘⌘ Why would you use MediaWiki as a CMS?
But this also true for Wordpress? Why still use MediaWiki?
- That depends where your focus is!
- Presentation -> Wordpress
- Structured Content -> Semantic Media Wiki
⌘⌘ What content is available in MediaWik/Semantic MediaWiki ?
| Photos | 
|
| Videos | 
|
| Maps | 
|
| Lists | 
|
| Tables | |
| Graphs | |
| ... |
⌘⌘ WikiCMS: use Semantic MediaWiki as CMS
⌘⌘ WikiCMS: separation of frontend and backend
⌘⌘ Questions/Discussion
